1. Overview
Know these facts cold before the first client conversation - they are also what the exam below tests. Not a substantive visa - it adds travel rights to your bridging situation.
Visa typeBridging
LodgementOnshore
StayA specified travel period
Work rightsAs per your conditions
Study rightsUsually yes
Government charge~$190
Processing time~days
2. Process flow
The handling sequence for a 020 file, from first consultation to decision. Each step assumes the one before it is genuinely finished - not "mostly done".
- Confirm the travel need
BVA holder with a genuine reason to travel while the substantive application is pending.
- Apply before booking
Apply with the travel reason and dates; get the BVB grant before the client buys non-refundable tickets.
- Brief on the window
The client must return within the specified travel period or they are offshore with a pending onshore application - a serious problem.
5. Cost checklist
Quote the full stack, in writing, before the client signs. Surprise costs are the fastest way to lose a client's trust (and earn a complaint).
| Item | Indicative amount |
|---|
| Base visa application charge (2025-26, indicative) | ~$190 |
| Usually no separate charge (BVB excepted) | The BVB charge is ~$190 |
| Your professional fee | Per your agency's schedule - quote in writing before Form 956 |
| Rule of thumb | Government charges usually change every 1 July - re-quote any file that lodges after 30 June |
7. Case studies - eligible cases
Illustrative composites showing what a grantable 020 file looks like in practice.
Grant: Isabella from Mexico
- Background
- Isabella, an onshore partner-visa applicant from Mexico. BVA holders who need to travel outside Australia and return while their substantive visa is pending.
- Why it qualified
- (1) Currently hold a Bridging visa A (or eligible bridging situation). (2) A genuine reason to travel and return. (3) Your substantive application still pending.
- What made the file strong
- Dates, names and figures matched across every document - no internal inconsistencies to trigger checks.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (~days).
Grant: Wei from Egypt
- Background
- Wei, a graduate whose visa expired from Egypt. BVA holders who need to travel outside Australia and return while their substantive visa is pending.
- Why it qualified
- (1) Currently hold a Bridging visa A (or eligible bridging situation). (2) A genuine reason to travel and return. (3) Your substantive application still pending.
- What made the file strong
- Every claim was evidenced before lodgement - nothing was left 'to follow'.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (~days).
8. Case studies - refusal cases
The same visa, handled badly. Every one of these failure modes is screenable at the first consultation.
Refusal: Elif from Brazil
- Background
- Elif, a skilled-visa applicant from Brazil, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 020.
- What went wrong
- Travelling past the BVB travel period
- Outcome
- The refusal went to review: another year, more cost, and no certainty the outcome changes.
- Lesson for the agent
- Front-load the file - address the weakness squarely in a submission instead of hoping the case officer will not notice.
Refusal: Kwame from South Africa
- Background
- Kwame, a former student-visa holder from South Africa, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 020.
- What went wrong
- Applying too late before departure
- Outcome
- The application was refused, and the refusal must now be declared on every future application, for any country.
- Lesson for the agent
- Screen for this at the first consultation, before money changes hands. It is cheaper to delay a lodgement than to fight a refusal.
9. Self-exam
10 questions drawn from this manual. Pass mark 80%. Answers are graded on the server and your result is recorded against your agent profile - retakes are unlimited and your best score is kept. Log in to the agent portal first so your result is saved to My trainings.