1. Overview
Know these facts cold before the first client conversation - they are also what the exam below tests. Permanent residence for the carer.
Visa typePermanent
LodgementOffshore (116) / Onshore (836)
StayPermanent
Work rightsUnlimited
Study rightsYes
Government charge~$5,125
Processing timeSeveral years (queue)
2. Process flow
The handling sequence for a 116 / 836 file, from first consultation to decision. Each step assumes the one before it is genuinely finished - not "mostly done".
- Medical assessment of the care recipient
The Australian relative's condition is assessed (via the Department's contracted assessor) as needing substantial ongoing care. Without a supportive assessment there is no case.
- Prove the care gap
Evidence that the care cannot reasonably be provided by other relatives in Australia or by community services - this is where most carer cases fail.
- Sponsorship and lodgement
The relative (or their family member) sponsors; lodge with the care plan.
- Queue and decision
Capped and queued - set multi-year expectations honestly.
5. Cost checklist
Quote the full stack, in writing, before the client signs. Surprise costs are the fastest way to lose a client's trust (and earn a complaint).
| Item | Indicative amount |
|---|
| Base visa application charge (2025-26, indicative) | ~$5,125 |
| Health examinations (per person) | ~$300-500 |
| Police certificates | ~$42-150 each |
| Relationship registration (where used) | State fees vary |
| Your professional fee | Per your agency's schedule - quote in writing before Form 956 |
| Rule of thumb | Government charges usually change every 1 July - re-quote any file that lodges after 30 June |
7. Case studies - eligible cases
Illustrative composites showing what a grantable 116 / 836 file looks like in practice.
Grant: Jorge from Iran
- Background
- Jorge, a hospitality manager from Iran. People coming to provide long-term care for a relative (or their family member) with a serious medical condition.
- Why it qualified
- (1) An Australian relative (or their family unit member) with a certified, ongoing medical condition. (2) The care needed cannot reasonably be provided by other relatives or services. (3) An eligible sponsor.
- What made the file strong
- The agent tested the weakest criterion first and fixed it before lodging, not after a natural-justice letter.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (Several years (queue)).
Grant: Lena from Sri Lanka
- Background
- Lena, a retired shopkeeper from Sri Lanka. People coming to provide long-term care for a relative (or their family member) with a serious medical condition.
- Why it qualified
- (1) An Australian relative (or their family unit member) with a certified, ongoing medical condition. (2) The care needed cannot reasonably be provided by other relatives or services. (3) An eligible sponsor.
- What made the file strong
- Dates, names and figures matched across every document - no internal inconsistencies to trigger checks.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (Several years (queue)).
8. Case studies - refusal cases
The same visa, handled badly. Every one of these failure modes is screenable at the first consultation.
Refusal: Tunde from India
- Background
- Tunde, a marketing coordinator from India, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 116 / 836.
- What went wrong
- Medical assessment (via Bupa/health services) not supporting the level of need
- Outcome
- The case officer decided on the papers without a further request - the file had to stand on its own, and it could not.
- Lesson for the agent
- Apply the decision-ready test: if you cannot evidence the claim today, the application is not ready to lodge.
Refusal: Anya from Colombia
- Background
- Anya, a small-business owner from Colombia, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 116 / 836.
- What went wrong
- Care reasonably available from others or community services
- Outcome
- The refusal went to review: another year, more cost, and no certainty the outcome changes.
- Lesson for the agent
- Front-load the file - address the weakness squarely in a submission instead of hoping the case officer will not notice.
9. Self-exam
9 questions drawn from this manual. Pass mark 80%. Answers are graded on the server and your result is recorded against your agent profile - retakes are unlimited and your best score is kept. Log in to the agent portal first so your result is saved to My trainings.