1. Overview
Know these facts cold before the first client conversation - they are also what the exam below tests. This is permanent residence.
Visa typePermanent
LodgementOnshore or offshore
StayPermanent
Work rightsUnlimited
Study rightsYes
Government chargeTwo instalments; second instalment ~$48,640 per applicant
Processing timeSeveral years (faster than non-contributory)
2. Process flow
The handling sequence for a 143 file, from first consultation to decision. Each step assumes the one before it is genuinely finished - not "mostly done".
- Balance-of-family test first
Count the sponsor's siblings: at least half the parent's children must live permanently in Australia (or more in Australia than any other single country). Fail this and no parent visa is possible - test it before taking a retainer.
- Sponsorship and lodgement
The settled child sponsors; lodge and join the queue. Set honest expectations - even the contributory stream runs years.
- Queue management
Keep contact details current and health stable; the Department will call the file up for final processing when the queue reaches it.
- Assurance of Support and second instalment
At final stage: AoS bond lodged through Services Australia and the large second instalment (~$48,640 per applicant). Clients must plan finances years ahead for this.
- Decision and briefing
PR on grant; brief on Medicare enrolment and the RRV travel facility.
5. Cost checklist
Quote the full stack, in writing, before the client signs. Surprise costs are the fastest way to lose a client's trust (and earn a complaint).
| Item | Indicative amount |
|---|
| Base visa application charge (2025-26, indicative) | Two instalments; second instalment ~$48,640 per applicant |
| Health examinations (per person) | ~$300-500 |
| Police certificates | ~$42-150 each |
| Relationship registration (where used) | State fees vary |
| Assurance of Support bond (refundable after 10 years for permanent parent visas) | $10,000 primary applicant (indicative) |
| Second instalment before grant | ~$48,640 per applicant |
| Your professional fee | Per your agency's schedule - quote in writing before Form 956 |
| Rule of thumb | Government charges usually change every 1 July - re-quote any file that lodges after 30 June |
7. Case studies - eligible cases
Illustrative composites showing what a grantable 143 file looks like in practice.
Grant: Amir from the Philippines
- Background
- Amir, a hospitality manager from the Philippines. Parents of a settled Australian citizen or PR child, paying the contributory charge for faster processing.
- Why it qualified
- (1) Pass the balance-of-family test. (2) An eligible sponsor (your settled child). (3) An Assurance of Support (a refundable bond).
- What made the file strong
- Every claim was evidenced before lodgement - nothing was left 'to follow'.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (Several years (faster than non-contributory)).
Grant: Ngoc from Turkey
- Background
- Ngoc, a retired shopkeeper from Turkey. Parents of a settled Australian citizen or PR child, paying the contributory charge for faster processing.
- Why it qualified
- (1) Pass the balance-of-family test. (2) An eligible sponsor (your settled child). (3) An Assurance of Support (a refundable bond).
- What made the file strong
- The file opened with a short submission mapping each criterion to its evidence, so the case officer never had to hunt.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (Several years (faster than non-contributory)).
8. Case studies - refusal cases
The same visa, handled badly. Every one of these failure modes is screenable at the first consultation.
Refusal: Omar from Nepal
- Background
- Omar, a marketing coordinator from Nepal, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 143.
- What went wrong
- Failing the balance-of-family test
- Outcome
- The application was refused, and the refusal must now be declared on every future application, for any country.
- Lesson for the agent
- Screen for this at the first consultation, before money changes hands. It is cheaper to delay a lodgement than to fight a refusal.
Refusal: Priya from Thailand
- Background
- Priya, a small-business owner from Thailand, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 143.
- What went wrong
- Underestimating the very large second instalment
- Outcome
- The Department refused; the client lost the application charge, months of lead time, and in this subclass a refusal also complicates any onshore follow-up.
- Lesson for the agent
- Put this issue on the document checklist on day one and refuse to lodge until it is closed out.
9. Self-exam
10 questions drawn from this manual. Pass mark 80%. Answers are graded on the server and your result is recorded against your agent profile - retakes are unlimited and your best score is kept. Log in to the agent portal first so your result is saved to My trainings.