1. Overview
Know these facts cold before the first client conversation - they are also what the exam below tests. This visa IS permanent residence.
Visa typePermanent
LodgementOnshore or offshore
StayPermanent
Work rightsUnlimited - full PR work rights
Study rightsYes
Government charge~$5,135 (main applicant)
Processing timeVaries - case by case
2. Process flow
The handling sequence for a 858 file, from first consultation to decision. Each step assumes the one before it is genuinely finished - not "mostly done".
- Audit the achievement record
The bar is an internationally recognised record of exceptional and outstanding achievement in an eligible field - prizes, patents, publications, senior roles, media, salary. Be honest early if the record is strong-but-ordinary.
- Secure the nominator
A national-reputation nominator (individual or organisation) in the same field completes Form 1000. A weak nominator undermines a strong record.
- Expression of Interest
Submit the EOI with the evidence mapped to the criteria; wait for an invitation - only invited candidates apply.
- Lodge and manage
Full evidence pack at lodgement: recognition, benefit to Australia, and standing in the field.
- Decision and briefing
PR on grant; processing is case-by-case rather than a published service standard.
5. Cost checklist
Quote the full stack, in writing, before the client signs. Surprise costs are the fastest way to lose a client's trust (and earn a complaint).
| Item | Indicative amount |
|---|
| Base visa application charge (2025-26, indicative) | ~$5,135 (main applicant) |
| Health examinations (per person) | ~$300-500 |
| Police certificates | ~$42-150 each |
| Document translation and notarisation | Varies with volume |
| Your professional fee | Per your agency's schedule - quote in writing before Form 956 |
| Rule of thumb | Government charges usually change every 1 July - re-quote any file that lodges after 30 June |
7. Case studies - eligible cases
Illustrative composites showing what a grantable 858 file looks like in practice.
Grant: Daniel from Sri Lanka
- Background
- Daniel, a machine-learning researcher from Sri Lanka. Highly skilled individuals with an internationally recognised record of exceptional and outstanding achievement. Replaced the Global Talent program.
- Why it qualified
- (1) A record of exceptional and outstanding achievement in an eligible field. (2) Recognition by peers internationally. (3) A nominator/endorsement where required.
- What made the file strong
- The agent tested the weakest criterion first and fixed it before lodging, not after a natural-justice letter.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (Varies - case by case).
Grant: Mei from India
- Background
- Mei, a fintech founder from India. Highly skilled individuals with an internationally recognised record of exceptional and outstanding achievement. Replaced the Global Talent program.
- Why it qualified
- (1) A record of exceptional and outstanding achievement in an eligible field. (2) Recognition by peers internationally. (3) A nominator/endorsement where required.
- What made the file strong
- Dates, names and figures matched across every document - no internal inconsistencies to trigger checks.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (Varies - case by case).
8. Case studies - refusal cases
The same visa, handled badly. Every one of these failure modes is screenable at the first consultation.
Refusal: Amir from Colombia
- Background
- Amir, a med-tech entrepreneur from Colombia, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 858.
- What went wrong
- Evidence that doesn't clearly rise to 'exceptional and outstanding'
- Outcome
- The case officer decided on the papers without a further request - the file had to stand on its own, and it could not.
- Lesson for the agent
- Put this issue on the document checklist on day one and refuse to lodge until it is closed out.
Refusal: Ngoc from Iran
- Background
- Ngoc, a robotics professor from Iran, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 858.
- What went wrong
- Weak or missing nomination/endorsement
- Outcome
- The refusal went to review: another year, more cost, and no certainty the outcome changes.
- Lesson for the agent
- Apply the decision-ready test: if you cannot evidence the claim today, the application is not ready to lodge.
9. Self-exam
10 questions drawn from this manual. Pass mark 80%. Answers are graded on the server and your result is recorded against your agent profile - retakes are unlimited and your best score is kept. Log in to the agent portal first so your result is saved to My trainings.