Training manual · Australia · Family & Partner

Parent visa (non-contributory) (subclass 103)

Parents seeking PR at a far lower cost than the contributory stream - but with extremely long queues.

PermanentFamily & PartnerOnshore or offshore
OverviewProcess flowEligibility checklistDocument checklistCost checklistQualification checklistEligible casesRefusal casesSelf-exam

1. Overview

Know these facts cold before the first client conversation - they are also what the exam below tests. Permanent residence - but the queue is the defining issue; many applicants consider the contributory stream instead.

Visa typePermanent
LodgementOnshore or offshore
StayPermanent
Work rightsUnlimited
Study rightsYes
Government chargeLower upfront (second instalment ~$3,115)
Processing timeVery long - commonly many years to decades in the queue

2. Process flow

The handling sequence for a 103 file, from first consultation to decision. Each step assumes the one before it is genuinely finished - not "mostly done".

  1. Balance-of-family test first

    Count the sponsor's siblings: at least half the parent's children must live permanently in Australia (or more in Australia than any other single country). Fail this and no parent visa is possible - test it before taking a retainer.

  2. This stream's twist

    Non-contributory: far cheaper, but the queue runs decades. Advise honestly - many clients should weigh the contributory stream or the 870 long-stay instead.

  3. Sponsorship and lodgement

    The settled child sponsors; lodge and join the queue. Set honest expectations - even the contributory stream runs years.

  4. Queue management

    Keep contact details current and health stable; the Department will call the file up for final processing when the queue reaches it.

  5. Assurance of Support and second instalment

    At final stage: AoS bond lodged through Services Australia and the large second instalment (~$48,640 per applicant). Clients must plan finances years ahead for this.

  6. Decision and briefing

    PR on grant; brief on Medicare enrolment and the RRV travel facility.

3. Eligibility checklist

Every box must be confirmable with evidence, not the client's say-so, before you advise that the 103 is viable.

Your ticks save in this browser so you can work through the manual across sessions.

4. Document checklist

The lodgement pack. Aim for decision-ready: a case officer should be able to grant without asking for anything further.

Your ticks save in this browser so you can work through the manual across sessions.

5. Cost checklist

Quote the full stack, in writing, before the client signs. Surprise costs are the fastest way to lose a client's trust (and earn a complaint).

ItemIndicative amount
Base visa application charge (2025-26, indicative)Lower upfront (second instalment ~$3,115)
Health examinations (per person)~$300-500
Police certificates~$42-150 each
Relationship registration (where used)State fees vary
Assurance of Support bond (refundable after 10 years for permanent parent visas)$10,000 primary applicant (indicative)
Your professional feePer your agency's schedule - quote in writing before Form 956
Rule of thumbGovernment charges usually change every 1 July - re-quote any file that lodges after 30 June

6. Qualification checklist

Run this in the first consultation, before taking a retainer. It screens the client, not the visa: history, hard stops and honesty come first.

Your ticks save in this browser so you can work through the manual across sessions.

7. Case studies - eligible cases

Illustrative composites showing what a grantable 103 file looks like in practice.

Grant: Rahul from Nepal

Background
Rahul, a small-business owner from Nepal. Parents seeking PR at a far lower cost than the contributory stream - but with extremely long queues.
Why it qualified
(1) Pass the balance-of-family test. (2) An eligible sponsor. (3) Assurance of Support.
What made the file strong
Every claim was evidenced before lodgement - nothing was left 'to follow'.
Outcome
Granted within the indicative processing window (Very long - commonly many years to decades in the queue).

Grant: Isabella from Thailand

Background
Isabella, a primary teacher from Thailand. Parents seeking PR at a far lower cost than the contributory stream - but with extremely long queues.
Why it qualified
(1) Pass the balance-of-family test. (2) An eligible sponsor. (3) Assurance of Support.
What made the file strong
The file opened with a short submission mapping each criterion to its evidence, so the case officer never had to hunt.
Outcome
Granted within the indicative processing window (Very long - commonly many years to decades in the queue).

8. Case studies - refusal cases

The same visa, handled badly. Every one of these failure modes is screenable at the first consultation.

Refusal: Wei from the Philippines

Background
Wei, a hospitality manager from the Philippines, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 103.
What went wrong
The processing queue can run for decades - plan around it
Outcome
The application was refused, and the refusal must now be declared on every future application, for any country.
Lesson for the agent
Put this issue on the document checklist on day one and refuse to lodge until it is closed out.

Refusal: Elif from Turkey

Background
Elif, a retired shopkeeper from Turkey, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 103.
What went wrong
Balance-of-family test failures
Outcome
The Department refused; the client lost the application charge, months of lead time, and in this subclass a refusal also complicates any onshore follow-up.
Lesson for the agent
Apply the decision-ready test: if you cannot evidence the claim today, the application is not ready to lodge.

9. Self-exam

10 questions drawn from this manual. Pass mark 80%. Answers are graded on the server and your result is recorded against your agent profile - retakes are unlimited and your best score is kept. Log in to the agent portal first so your result is saved to My trainings.

Back to all manuals