1. Overview
Know these facts cold before the first client conversation - they are also what the exam below tests. No (temporary) - but lets parents live in Australia long-term while a permanent option is considered.
Visa typeTemporary (up to 5 yrs)
LodgementOnshore or offshore
Stay3 or 5 years (renewable up to 10 years total)
Work rightsNo work permitted
Study rightsYes (incidental)
Government charge~$5,560 (5-yr) or ~$2,790 (3-yr), plus sponsorship fee
Processing time~6-10 months (after sponsor approval)
2. Process flow
The handling sequence for a 870 file, from first consultation to decision. Each step assumes the one before it is genuinely finished - not "mostly done".
- Sponsor approval comes first
The child in Australia applies to be an approved Parent Sponsor and must meet income requirements. The visa application cannot precede sponsor approval.
- Health insurance
Adequate Australian health insurance for the full stay is a grant condition - price it before the client commits.
- Visa application
Choose 3-year or 5-year validity; evidence the family relationship and no outstanding public-health debt.
- Decision and briefing
No work rights; renewable up to 10 years total but it never converts to PR by itself - keep the permanent parent options on the table.
5. Cost checklist
Quote the full stack, in writing, before the client signs. Surprise costs are the fastest way to lose a client's trust (and earn a complaint).
| Item | Indicative amount |
|---|
| Base visa application charge (2025-26, indicative) | ~$5,560 (5-yr) or ~$2,790 (3-yr), plus sponsorship fee |
| Health examinations (per person) | ~$300-500 |
| Police certificates | ~$42-150 each |
| Relationship registration (where used) | State fees vary |
| Parent sponsorship application (the child's application) | ~$1,570 (indicative) |
| Australian health insurance for the stay | Quote before committing |
| Your professional fee | Per your agency's schedule - quote in writing before Form 956 |
| Rule of thumb | Government charges usually change every 1 July - re-quote any file that lodges after 30 June |
7. Case studies - eligible cases
Illustrative composites showing what a grantable 870 file looks like in practice.
Grant: Jorge from Nepal
- Background
- Jorge, a hospitality manager from Nepal. Parents who want to spend extended time with family in Australia without joining the permanent parent queue.
- Why it qualified
- (1) An approved Parent Sponsor (your child) who meets income requirements. (2) Adequate health insurance for the stay. (3) No outstanding public health debt.
- What made the file strong
- The agent tested the weakest criterion first and fixed it before lodging, not after a natural-justice letter.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (~6-10 months (after sponsor approval)).
Grant: Lena from Thailand
- Background
- Lena, a retired shopkeeper from Thailand. Parents who want to spend extended time with family in Australia without joining the permanent parent queue.
- Why it qualified
- (1) An approved Parent Sponsor (your child) who meets income requirements. (2) Adequate health insurance for the stay. (3) No outstanding public health debt.
- What made the file strong
- Dates, names and figures matched across every document - no internal inconsistencies to trigger checks.
- Outcome
- Granted within the indicative processing window (~6-10 months (after sponsor approval)).
8. Case studies - refusal cases
The same visa, handled badly. Every one of these failure modes is screenable at the first consultation.
Refusal: Tunde from the Philippines
- Background
- Tunde, a marketing coordinator from the Philippines, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 870.
- What went wrong
- Sponsor not approved first (sponsorship is a separate step)
- Outcome
- The case officer decided on the papers without a further request - the file had to stand on its own, and it could not.
- Lesson for the agent
- Apply the decision-ready test: if you cannot evidence the claim today, the application is not ready to lodge.
Refusal: Anya from Turkey
- Background
- Anya, a small-business owner from Turkey, engaged an agent late and pushed for a fast lodgement of the 870.
- What went wrong
- Working in breach of the no-work condition
- Outcome
- The refusal went to review: another year, more cost, and no certainty the outcome changes.
- Lesson for the agent
- Front-load the file - address the weakness squarely in a submission instead of hoping the case officer will not notice.
9. Self-exam
10 questions drawn from this manual. Pass mark 80%. Answers are graded on the server and your result is recorded against your agent profile - retakes are unlimited and your best score is kept. Log in to the agent portal first so your result is saved to My trainings.